In literature we commonly see the use of a freewheel diode to protect the circuit against the inductive kick when the switch goes from closed to open (Fig 1). However, what would be the pros/cons of discharging the energy to ground through say a Zener diode (Fig 2)? I have never seen this in practice and I wonder why.
Electrical – Can the inductive kick be discharged without a freewheeling diode, in this example
flybackinductorswitches
Related Question
- Electronic – Common Gate Level Shifter
- How does flyback diode decrease the response time of a solenoid valve
- Electronic – How different is the performance of TVS vs Zener diode in flyback protection
- Electronic – Making LM78xx fail safe against short, open, reverese bias, flyback, etc
- Electronic – “A zener with series diode”
- Electronic – I need a switch that not only detects open/close, but also sends a pulse to wake up an ESP8266 whenever the (debounced) state changes
- Electrical – Can a stepper motor flyback diode discharge a coil when connected in serial to the coil and opposite to the current
- Electronic – Questions about Inductive Kickback and what causes an inductor to discharge
Best Answer
It's frequently used in applications such as actuation of fuel injection solenoids where it's important to collapse the magnetic field as fast as possible.
Edit: See, for example, the LM1949 fuel injector driver IC which shows an external 33V 5W zener diode. Typical 'on' timing is 2.5 to 3.5ms, and a typical inductance is in the ~2mH range.
It's also possible to use an avalanche-rated MOSFET or add a zener from MOSFET drain to gate in order to cause clamping at a predetermined voltage. See, for example, TI's TPIC6C595 power shift register. One big advantage in this particular case is that it saves a pin on the IC.
Since more of the energy is dissipated in an active device, this is harder on the switching circuit. When you use a diode, most of the energy is lost in the coil resistance and only a small amount is lost in the diode.
You can also simply add a resistor in series with the normal flyback diode. Since the peak current is the same as the current prior to switching off, the peak voltage will be the supply voltage plus a diode drop plus the current times the series resistance. The diode is not necessary for the purpose of limiting the voltage, but it prevents the resistor from dissipating power while the coil is energized.
Edit: (below is a simulation of 1mH inductance with 1 ohm series resistance and 10A rectifier, shortly after 10A current is switched off)
Pink trace is diode current, cyan trace is power in the coil resistance, red trace is power in the diode. Force of a solenoid will be more-or-less proportional to the coil (and thus diode) current (pink trace).
Integrated energy for the rectifier: 7.7681mJ Integrated energy for the coil: 41.844mJ
As a check, the total energy stored in the magnetic field is obviously 50mJ, and the two add up to 49.6mJ, pretty close. I've used a real MOSFET model for the switch
By comparison if you remove the diode and add a 36V zener across the transistor, the current drops to zero in about 350us rather than 2.5ms, a 7:1 improvement, but the zener sees a peak power of 360W and absorbs most of the stored energy.