As the title suggests, I am curious where the term came from. A twenty-minute Google search did not yield any useful results.
More specifically, I am wondering why the word "cheap" was used.
Etymonline says about cheap and cheap shot that
Sense of "lightly esteemed, common" is from 1590s….
Cheap shot originally was U.S. football jargon for a head-on tackle; extended sense "unfair hit" in politics, etc. is by 1970.
But in Esquire, 1966, the etymology at Etymonline is contradicted by a letter-writer:
Professional football players do not now, and probably never did, refer to a head-on tackle as a "cheap shot." A head-on tackle is not won cheaply.
So the sense given by Etymonline for both cheap and cheap shot doesn't seem to be correct.
Best Answer
The phrase 'cheap shot' in the literal sense of inexpensive "Projectiles (esp. balls or bullets, as distinguished from explosive ‘shells’) designed to be discharged from a firearm or cannon by the force of an explosive" (OED Online) does not appear in the sources I checked (free online popular news archives, Google Books, OED Online) until 1864:
(The Sydney Morning Herald, 18 Aug 1864.)
Earlier attestations of the phrase 'cheap shot' with reference to the action of shooting (a 'shot'), specifically in the sense of "9. a. An attempt to hit with a projectile discharged from a gun. ....", include two that draw on sense 9b, the figurative sense derived from 9a:
["shot, n.1". OED Online. September 2016. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/178651?redirectedFrom=cheap+shot (accessed September 21, 2016). Attested from 1841 as 'shot' and from 1973 as 'cheap shot'. Sense 14b refers to "a cannonball".]
Elsewhere than in OED Online, 'cheap shot' is defined more generally to include actions as well as remarks. Such definitions more accurately reflect the range of figurative senses I am familiar with:
(Random House Kernerman Webster’s College Dictionary. S.v. "cheap shot." Retrieved September 21 2016 from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cheap+shot.)
The sense of 'cheap' in the phrase, overall, is the figurative
["cheap, adj., adv., and n.2". OED Online. September 2016. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/31047?rskey=CShTCr&result=2&isAdvanced=false (accessed September 21, 2016).]
That figurative sense of 'cheap' is often used disparagingly.
The first of the two early attestations may be interpreted as a literal reference to the two dollars spent for a shot that killed forty-seven ducks. However, the decades-long series of elaborations and reproductions of the story, in works such as More puniana; or, Thoughts wise and otherwhy's, 1875, suggest otherwise.
(Family Herald, Volume 2, 1844, a British publication, as reproduced in South Australian Register, 4 Oct 1845.)
The second early attestation of the phrase, a 1918 use in figurative sense 9b, is quite evidently an elaborate pun:
(The Adelaide Chronicle, 27 Jul 1918.)
Chronologically between those two early attestations of the figurative sense 9b in anecdotal puns is this rather more prosaic 1896 use of the term in another British publication. Here the sense of 'cheap' is literal ('inexpensive') and the use of 'shot' is figurative:
(The Sketch: A Journal of Art and Actuality, Volume 12, 1896.)
Hard on the heels of the 1844 and 1918 uses of the term in figurative sense 9b comes a third such use, a slanted 1921 Australian use in a political context pertaining to religosity:
(The Freeman's Journal, Sydney, 24 Nov 1921.)
Later, in 1929, a use with reference to sports (hockey) appears. In this use, 'shot' has the extended literal sense of an 'attempt to hit with a projectile' (the goal with the hockey puck), while 'cheap' has the extended figurative sense of 'easily obtained' used somewhat disparagingly:
(The Heights, Boston College, 29 Jan 1929.)
Aside from uses in political contexts with disparaging reference to remarks in debates (Parliamentary Debates (Hansard): House of Commons Official Report, Volume 384, 1941), the next use I discovered was also a reference to sports—this time cricket:
(The Cairns Post, Queensland, 31 Dec 1947.)
The sense of that use is somewhat opaque to me, unfamiliar as I am with cricket jargon, but I surmise the use may be a more or less literal reference to 'shot' in the sense given earlier (9a), preceded by a figurative reference to 'cheap'.
Following the 120 year history of development shown above, uses with reference to professional US football and boxing began to make appearances in the 1960s. In these uses, the 'shot' is with a human body employed as a projectile, and the cheapness lies in the unexpected or sneaky nature of the hit. Along with those uses are others pertaining to discreditable actions and remarks:
(Limitation of Attorneys' Fees: Hearing, Eighty-ninth Congress, Second Session, 28 Feb 1966.)
(Film Culture, 1966.)
(The Running Back: A Novel of Professional Football, Hamilton Maule, 1966.)
(The realm of sport, 1966.)
(Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, 1967.)
(Time, 1967.)
(Football Lingo, Zander Hollander, Paul Lionel Zimmerman, 1967.)
In summary, the term 'cheap shot' has been in use with the meaning
since 1844.
In later years, along with its other uses, the term came to be employed in sports, especially professional US football, where its meaning was applied to sport-specific actions and situations.